Section Manager, Structures Maintenance (AFSCME)

BART
Oakland, California United States  View Map
Posted: Mar 17, 2026
  • Salary: $138,881.60 - $168,812.80 Annually USD
  • Full Time
  • Administration and Management
  • Building Maintenance
  • Job Description

    Marketing Statement

    Ride BART to a satisfying career that lets you both: 1) make a difference to Bay Area residents, and 2) enjoy excellent pay, benefits, and employment stability. BART is looking for people who like to be challenged, work in a fast-paced environment, and have a passion for connecting riders to work, school and other places they need to go. BART offers a competitive salary, comprehensive health benefits, paid time off, and the CalPERS retirement program.

    Job Summary

    Pay Rate

    AFSCME Salary Grade A17

    $138,881.60/annually (minimum) to $168,812.80/annually (maximum).

    Note: The negotiable salary offer will be commensurate with education and experience.

    Reports To

    Superintendent of Way and Facilities

    Current Assignment

    BART is seeking a dynamic and strategic leader to serve as Section Manager, Structures Maintenance. This is a mission-critical role responsible for preserving and modernizing the structural integrity of one of the most vital public transportation systems in the nation.

    This assignment leads the maintenance, inspection, repair, and rehabilitation of BART’s extensive structural assets, including aerial guideways, bridges, tunnels, retaining walls, platforms, parking structures, yards, and ancillary facilities. The selected candidate will play a central role in ensuring safety, reliability, regulatory compliance, and state-of-good-repair performance across a complex, aging, and high-visibility infrastructure network.

    This is a hands-on operational leadership role that blends engineering judgment, asset management strategy, field execution, workforce development, and capital program coordination.
    Please note, this will be a grave shift position.

    The Section Manager will focus on the following critical priorities:
    • Infrastructure Safety & System Integrity
    • State of Good Repair & Asset Lifecycle Management
    • Emergency Response & System Resiliency
    • Workforce Leadership & Development
    • Capital & Interdepartmental Coordination
    • Regulatory & Environmental Compliance

    The most qualified candidate for this position will have highly developed competencies beyond the minimum qualifications in the following areas, which will be reinforced with related work experience and will be clearly articulated during the selection process:

    • Exceptional Resource Management: You excel at orchestrating personnel, specialized tools, and heavy equipment to maximize efficiency and ensure excellent execution of maintenance schedules.
    • Dynamic Leadership & Organization: You are a natural multitasker who thrives in a fast-paced field environment, capable of seamlessly managing shifting priorities, project schedules, and emergency responses.
    • Relationship Building: You have a proven track record of fostering strong, collaborative relationships with both internal teams (across different shifts and divisions) and external partners.
    • Technical Authority: You bring deep knowledge of the procedures, standards, and safety requirements necessary for the calibration, servicing, and use of specialized structural testing and measurement equipment.


    Application & Selection Process

    This position is represented by American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). All applicants must apply online at www.bart.gov/jobs . Applications must be completed in full and include all requested information, including dates of employment, positions held, hours worked, and a detailed description of duties performed.

    Applicants may attach a resume to provide supplemental information; however, the resume does not substitute for completing the application form in its entirety. Only information included in the application at the time of submission will be used to determine whether applicants meet the minimum qualifications for the position. All application materials must be submitted by the closing date and time listed on the job announcement. Applications received after the closing deadline will not be considered.

    Applicants who require assistance with the online application process may contact the Talent Acquisition Division at (510) 464-6112 or employment@bart.gov .

    The selection process for this position may include one or more of the following: a skills or performance demonstration, written examination, and/or panel or individual interview.

    All applications will be reviewed by the Talent Acquisition Division to determine whether applicants meet the established Minimum Qualifications (MQs). Applicants who meet the MQs may be referred to the hiring department for further evaluation as part of the selection process.

    The selected candidate must demonstrate a work history reflecting reliability and dependability and may be required to provide copies of certificates, diplomas, or other documentation required by law, including proof of authorization to work in the United States.

    Pre-employment processing will include a background check. This requirement does not apply to current full-time District employees unless the position requires additional evaluations or clearances.

    Examples of Duties

    Oversees and coordinates the organization, staffing and operational activities on an assigned shift for the inspection, maintenance and repair of all stations, tunnels, subways and other structures.

    Participates in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies and priorities; recommends and implements resulting policies and procedures.

    Identifies opportunities for improving service delivery methods and procedures; identifies resource needs; reviews with appropriate management staff; implements improvements.

    Directs, coordinates and reviews the work plan for assigned structures maintenance, inspection and repair services and activities on assigned shift; assigns work activities and projects.

    Monitors work flow; reviews and evaluates work products, methods and procedures; meets with staff to identify and resolve problems.

    Determines preventive maintenance priorities and standards; ensures work complies with District standards and procedures.

    Inspects structures and facilities; monitors conditions to track maintenance requirements; maintains records and logs.

    Conducts on-the-job instruction for assigned employees, including safety practices; specifies and coordinates provision of safe clearances.

    Participates in the development and administration of the division's annual budget; participates in the forecast of funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials and supplies; monitors and approves expenditures; implements adjustments.

    Selects, trains, motivates and evaluates assigned personnel; provides or coordinates staff training; works with employees to correct deficiencies; implements discipline and termination procedures.

    Participates on a variety of committees; prepares and presents staff reports and other correspondence as appropriate and necessary.

    Provides technical support to other District departments and divisions; coordinates structure maintenance activities with those of other shifts, divisions and outside agencies and organizations.

    Attends and participates in professional group meetings; stays abreast of new trends and innovations in the field of structures maintenance, inspection and repair.



    Minimum Qualifications

    Education :
    An Associate degree in engineering, construction management, facilities maintenance or a closely related field from an accredited college.

    Experience :
    Four (4) years of (full-time equivalent) verifiable structures maintenance, inspection and repair experience, which must have included at least two (2) years of administrative and/or supervisory experience.

    Other Requirements :
    Must be willing to work emergency overtime and back shifts.
    Must have sufficient physical mobility to inspect track and/or structures/equipment throughout the District.
    Must possess a valid California driver’s license and have a satisfactory driving record.

    Substitution :
    Additional professional experience as outlined above may be substituted for the education on a year-for-year basis. An Associate degree is preferred.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge of :
    • Operations, services and activities of a comprehensive structures maintenance, inspection and repair program.
    • Principles and practices of structural integrity, grading, slopes related concepts management.
    • Principles and practices of project scheduling and management.
    • Methods and techniques of conducting construction site inspection.
    • Methods, techniques, materials, equipment used in structural inspection and maintenance.
    • Principles and practices of budget preparation and management.
    • Contract administration and management.
    • Principles and practices of construction management.
    • Principles and practices of safety as it pertains to structures maintenance and inspection.
    • Terminology, methods, practices, and techniques used in technical report preparation.
    • Principles and procedures of record keeping.
    • Current office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers.
    • Principles of supervision, training and performance evaluation.
    • Related Federal, State and local laws, codes and regulations.
    Skill in :
    • Managing, supervising and coordinating structures maintenance, inspection and repair services on assigned shift.
    • Selecting, supervising, training and evaluating staff.
    • Interpreting and explaining District maintenance and repair policies and procedures.
    • Monitoring technical developments related to Structures Maintenance repair and construction.
    • Analyzing structures maintenance and inspection problems.
    • Analyzing problems, identifying alternative solutions, projecting consequences of proposed actions and implementing recommendations in support of goals.
    • Preparing clear and concise reports.
    • Maintaining records and logs.
    • Communicating clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing.
    • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of the work.


    Equal Employment Opportunity GroupBox1

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District is an equal opportunity employer. Applicants shall not be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age (40 and above), religion, national origin (including language use restrictions), disability (mental and physical, including HIV and AIDS), ancestry, marital status, military status, veteran status, medical condition (cancer/genetic characteristics and information), or any protected category prohibited by local, state or federal laws.

    The BART Human Resources Department will make reasonable efforts in the examination process to accommodate persons with disabilities or for religious reasons. Please advise the Human Resources Department of any special needs in advance of the examination by emailing at least 5 days before your examination date at employment@bart.gov .

    Qualified veterans may be eligible to obtain additional veteran's credit in the selection process for this recruitment (effective Jan. 1, 2013). To obtain the credit, veterans must attach to the application a DD214 discharge document or proof of disability and complete/submit the Veteran's Preference Application no later than the closing date of the posting. For more information about this credit please go to the Veteran's Preference Policy and Application link at www.bart.gov/jobs .

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) prides itself in offering best in class benefits packages to employees of the District. Currently, the following benefits may be available to employees in this job classification.

    Highlights
    • Medical Coverage (or $350/month if opted out)
    • Dental Coverage
    • Vision Insurance (Basic and Enhanced Plans Available)
    • Retirement Plan through the CA Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
      • 2% @ 55 (Classic Members)
      • 2% @ 62 (PEPRA Members)
      • Reciprocity available for existing members of many other public retirement systems (see BART website and/or CalPERS website for details)
    • Money Purchase Pension Plan (in-lieu of participating in Social Security tax)
      • 6.65% employer contribution up to annual maximum of $1,868.65
    • Deferred Compensation & Roth 457
    • Sick Leave Accruals (12 days per year)
    • Vacation Accruals (3-6 weeks based on time worked w/ the District)
    • Holidays: 9 observed holidays and 4 floating holidays
    • Life Insurance w/ ability to obtain additional coverage
    • Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) Insurance
    • Survivor Benefits through BART
    • Short-Term Disability Insurance
    • Long-Term Disability Insurance
    • Flexible Spending Accounts: Health and Dependent Care
    • Commuter Benefits
    • Free BART Passes for BART employees and eligible family members.


    Closing Date/Time: 3/27/2026 11:59 PM Pacific
  • ABOUT THE COMPANY

    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)
    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)

    The BART story began in 1946. It began not by governmental fiat, but as a concept gradually evolving at informal gatherings of business and civic leaders on both sides of the San Francisco Bay. Facing a heavy post-war migration to the area and its consequent automobile boom, these people discussed ways of easing the mounting congestion that was clogging the bridges spanning the Bay. In 1947, a joint Army-Navy review Board concluded that another connecting link between San Francisco and Oakland would be needed in the years ahead to prevent intolerable congestion on the Bay Bridge. The link? An underwater tube devoted exclusively to high-speed electric trains.

    Since 1911, visionaries had periodically brought up this Jules Verne concept. But now, pressure for a traffic solution increased with the population. In 1951, the State Legislature created the 26-member San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Commission, comprised of representatives from each of the nine counties which touch the Bay. The Commission's charge was to study the Bay Area's long range transportation needs in the context of environmental problems and then recommend the best solution.

    The Commission advised, in its final report in 1957, that any transportation plan must be coordinated with the area's total plan for future development. Since no development plan existed, the Commission prepared one itself. The result of their thoroughness is a master plan which did much to bring about coordinated planning in the Bay Area, and which was adopted a decade later by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).

    The BART Concept is Born
    The Commission's least-cost solution to traffic tie-ups was to recommend forming a five-county rapid transit district, whose mandate would be to build and operate a high-speed rapid rail network linking major commercial centers with suburban sub-centers.

    The Commission stated that, "If the Bay Area is to be preserved as a fine place to live and work, a regional rapid transit system is essential to prevent total dependence on automobiles and freeways."

    Thus was born the environmental concept underlying BART. Acting on the Commission's recommendations, in 1957, the Legislature formed the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, comprising the five counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo. At this time, the District was granted a taxing power of five cents per $100 of assessed valuation. It also had authority to levy property taxes to support a general obligation bond issue, if approved by District voters. The State Legislature lowered the requirement for voter approval from 66 percent to 60 percent.

    Between 1957 and 1962, engineering plans were developed for a system that would usher in a new era in rapid transit. Electric trains would run on grade-separated right-of-ways, reaching maximum speeds of 75-80 mph, averaging perhaps 45 mph, including station stops. Advanced transit cars, with sophisticated suspensions, braking and propulsion systems, and luxurious interiors, would be strong competition to "King Car " in the Bay Area. Stations would be pleasant, conveniently located, and striking architectural enhancements to their respective on-line communities.

    BART employees in the 1970s

    BART employees in the 1970s.

    Hundreds of meetings were held in the District communities to encourage local citizen participation in the development of routes and station locations. By midsummer, 1961, the final plan was submitted to the supervisors of the five District counties for approval. San Mateo County Supervisors were cool to the plan. Citing the high costs of a new system-plus adequate existing service from Southern Pacific commuter trains - they voted to withdraw their county from the District in December 1961.

    With the District-wide tax base thus weakened by the withdrawal of San Mateo County, Marin County was forced to withdraw in early 1962 because its marginal tax base could not adequately absorb its share of BART's projected cost. Another important factor in Marin's withdrawal was an engineering controversy over the feasibility of carrying trains across the Golden Gate Bridge.

    BART had started with a 16-member governing Board of Directors apportioned on county population size: four from Alameda and San Francisco Counties, three from Contra Costa and San Mateo, and two from Marin. When the District was reduced to three counties, the Board was reduced to 11 members: four from San Francisco and Alameda, and three from Contra Costa. Subsequently, in 1965, the District's enabling legislation was changed to apportion the BART Board with four Directors from each county, thus giving Contra Costa its fourth member on a 12-person Board. Two directors from each county, hence forth, were appointed by the County Board of Supervisors. The other two directors were appointed by committees of mayors of each county (with the exception of the City and County of San Francisco, whose sole mayor made these appointments).

    The five-county plan was quickly revised to a three-county plan emphasizing rapid transit between San Francisco and the East Bay cities and suburbs of Contra Costa and Alameda counties. The new plan, elaborately detailed and presented as the "BART Composite Report, " was approved by supervisors of the three counties in July 1962, and placed on the ballot for the following November general election.

    The plan required approval of 60 percent of the District's voters. It narrowly passed with a 61.2 percent vote District-wide, much to the surprise of many political experts who were confident it would fail. Indeed, one influential executive was reported to have said: "If I'd known the damn thing would have passed, I'd never have supported it. "

    The voters approved a $792 million bond issue to finance a 71.5 mile high-speed transit system, consisting of 33 stations serving 17 communities in the three counties. The proposal also included another needed transit project: rebuilding 3.5 miles of the San Francisco Municipal Railway. The new line would link muni streetcar lines directly with BART and Market Street stations, and four new Muni stations would be built.

    The additional cost of the transbay tube -- estimated at $133 million -- was to come from bonds issued by the California Toll Bridge Authority and secured by future Bay Area Bridge revenues. The additional cost of rolling stock, estimated at $71 million, was to be funded primarily from bonds issued against future operating revenues. Thus, the total cost of the system, as of 1962, was projected at $996 million. It would be the largest single public works project ever undertaken in the U.S. by the local citizenry.

    After the election, engineers immediately started work on the final system designs, only to be halted by a taxpayer's suit filed against the District a month later. The validity of the bond election, and the legality of the District itself, were challenged. While the court ruled in favor of the District on both counts, six months of litigation cost $12 million in construction delays. This would be the first of many delays from litigation and time-consuming negotiations involving 166 separate agreements reached with on-line cities, counties, and other special districts. The democratic processes of building a new transit system would prove to be major cost factors that, however necessary, were not foreseen.

     

    Show more

MORE JOBS

  • Deputy Sheriff I (POST Academy Graduate)

    • Dublin, California
    • Alameda County
    • Dec 20, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Public Safety
  • Navy Chaplain

    • Washington, DC
    • U.S. Navy
    • Mar 19, 2026
    • Full Time
    • Administration and Management
  • SEAL Officer

    • Tompkinsville, Kentucky
    • U.S. Navy
    • Mar 19, 2026
    • Full Time
    • Administration and Management
  • Day Camp Counselor - Park Explorers - Seasonal - Summer 2026 ($21.61/hour - $29.17/hour)

    • Hayward, California
    • Hayward Area Recreation and Park District
    • Feb 15, 2026
    • Human and Social Services
    • Legal Services
  • Lecture Pool for Department of Philosophy AY 25-26

    • Hayward, California
    • Cal State University (CSU) East Bay
    • Jun 14, 2025
    • Education and Training
    • Parks and Recreation
  • VETERAN INTERN, HEAVY MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT

    • Los Angeles, California
    • LOS ANGELES COUNTY
    • May 23, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Building Maintenance
    • Internship
    • Veteran Services
Show More
Apply Now Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.
Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.